Chronostratigraphy and geochronology: A proposed realignment
Publication date
2013
Authors
Zalasiewicz, J.
Cita, M.B.
Hilgen, F.
Pratt, B.R.
Strasser, A.
Thierry, J.
Weissert, H.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2013
Abstract
We propose a realignment of the terms geochronology and
chronostratigraphy that brings them broadly into line with current
use, while simultaneously resolving the debate over whether the
Geological Time Scale should have a “single” or “dual” hierarchy
of units: Both parallel sets of units are retained, although there
remains the option to adopt either a single (i.e., geochronological)
or a dual hierarchy in particular studies, as considered appropriate.
Thus, geochronology expresses the timing or age of events
(depositional, diagenetic, biotic, climatic, tectonic, magmatic) in
Earth’s history (e.g., Hirnantian glaciation, Famennian-Frasnian
mass extinction). Geochronology can also qualify rock bodies,
stratified or unstratified, with respect to the time interval(s) in
which they formed (e.g., Early Ordovician Ibex Group). In
addition, geochronology refers to all methods of numerical
dating. Chronostratigraphy would include all methods (e.g.,
biostratigraphy,
magnetostratigraphy, chemostratigraphy,
cyclostratigraphy,
sequence stratigraphy) for (1) establishing the
relative time relationships of stratigraphic successions regionally
and worldwide; and (2) formally naming bodies of stratified rock
that were deposited contemporaneously with units formally
defined at their base, ideally by a GSSP (Global Boundary
Stratotype Section and Point = “golden spike”) that represents a
specific point in time. Geochronologic units may be defined and
applied generally by either GSSPs or—as currently in most of the
Precambrian—by Global Standard Stratigraphic Ages (GSSAs).
Geochronologic units would continue as the time units eons/eras/
periods/epochs/ages, and chronostratigraphic units as the timerock
units eonothems/erathems/systems/series/stages. Both
hierarchies would remain available for use, as recommended by a
formal vote of the International Commission on Stratigraphy in
2010. Geological context helps determine the appropriate usage of
the component units.