Practical solution or missed opportunity? The impact of language of instruction on Dutch history teachers’ application of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)

Publication date

2022-07

Authors

Oattes, Huub
Wilschut, Arie
Oostdam, Ron
Fukkink, Ruben
de Graaff, R.ORCID 0000-0001-6154-7286ISNI 0000000093854224

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Teaching history requires clear, detailed and subject specific language. History teachers teaching in a second language are confronted with students' second language limitations, which likely have an aggravating impact on their application of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). We analysed and compared 12 Dutch spoken and 12 English spoken paired history lessons in junior grades 7 and 9. Contrary to our expectation, we found a strong similarity of the teachers’ PCK application in both grades 7 and 9, irrespective of the used language. The PCK application in both grades and languages was of average quality, while the PCK used in grade 9 was more advanced.

Keywords

Bilingual history education, Clil, History teacher, Junior secondary education, Pedagogical content knowledge

Citation

Oattes, H, Wilschut, A, Oostdam, R, Fukkink, R & Graaff, R D 2022, 'Practical solution or missed opportunity? The impact of language of instruction on Dutch history teachers’ application of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)', Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 115, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103721