Early Health Economic Analysis of 1.5T MRI-guided Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

Publication date

2021-08

Authors

Hehakaya, CharismaORCID 0000-0001-9341-7240
van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R NISNI 0000000393775683
Vanneste, B. G.
Grutters, J. P.
Grobbee, RickORCID 0000-0003-4472-4468ISNI 0000000030206553
Verkooijen, Helena MORCID 0000-0001-9480-1623
Frederix, Geert

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Abstract

Collections

License

Abstract

Purpose or Objective 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy linear accelerator (MR-Linac) is gaining interest for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Evidence of clinical effectiveness is still lacking and it therefore remains uncertain whether MR-Linac is cost-effective. An early health economic analysis was performed to calculate the necessary relative reduction in complications and the maximum price of MR-Linac treatment (5 fractions) to be cost-effective compared to 5, 20 and 39 fractionation schedules of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Materials and Methods A state transition model was developed for men with localized prostate cancer. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of MR-Linac and comparators were calculated over lifetime. Complication rates such as grade ≥2 urinary, grade ≥2 bowel and sexual complications, and utilities were based on systematic literature searches. Costs were estimated from literature using a Dutch healthcare perspective. Threshold analyses were performed to identify the thresholds of complications and costs for MR- Linac to be cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to outline uncertainty outcomes of all parameters. Results At a cost price of €6,460 per patient, no reductions in complications were needed to consider MR-Linac cost-effective compared to EBRT 20 and 39 fractions. Compared to EBRT 5 fractions and LDR brachytherapy, MR-Linac is found to be cost-effective when complications are relatively reduced by 54% and 66% respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results are highly sensitive to the utilities of urinary, bowel and sexual complications and the probability of biochemical progression. Conclusion MR-Linac is likely to be cost-effective compared to 20 and 39 fractions EBRT. For MR-Linac to become cost-effective compared to 5 fractions EBRT and LDR brachytherapy, it has to either reduce complications substantially or be offered at limited costs.

Keywords

MRI-guided radiotherapy, MR-Linac, Localized prostate cancer, Early cost-effectiveness

Citation

Hehakaya, C, van Zyp, J R V D V, Vanneste, B G, Grutters, J P, Grobbee, D E, Verkooijen, H M & Frederix, G W 2021, 'Early Health Economic Analysis of 1.5T MRI-guided Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer', Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 161, no. S1, pp. S1081-S1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(21)07770-7