Determinants of epoxy allergy in the construction industry: a case-control study

Publication date

2016-01-29

Authors

Spee, Ton
Timmerman, J.G.ISNI 0000000507450044
Rühl, Reinhold
Kersting, Klaus
Heederik, D.ISNI 0000000388327640
Smit, Lidwien A MISNI 0000000419422537

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workers exposed to epoxy products are at risk of developing allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To compare workers throughout the German construction industry with and without skin allergy to epoxy resins, hardeners, and/or reactive diluents, and to investigate which determinants are related to the development of epoxy allergy. METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by 179 epoxy allergy cases, and 151 epoxy workers as controls. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by the use of backwards stepwise logistic regression analysis. A multiple imputation approach was used to deal with missing data. RESULTS: Epoxy allergy was associated with an unusually high level of exposure to epoxy products [OR 2.13 (95%CI: 1.01-4.51)], wearing short sleeves or short trousers [OR 2.38 (95%CI: 1.03-5.52)], and not always using the correct type of gloves [OR 2.12 (95%CI: 1.12-4.01)]. A monotonic increasing risk was found with increasing exposure hours per week [OR 1.72 (95%CI: 1.39-2.14)]. Not using skin cream was inversely associated with epoxy allergy [OR 0.22 (95%CI: 0.08-0.59)]. Years working with epoxy products were inversely associated with epoxy allergy [OR 0.41 (95%CI: 0.27-0.61) per 10-year increase], suggesting a healthy worker survivor effect. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational epoxy allergy may be prevented by improving occupational hygiene behaviour and personal protection.

Keywords

epidemiology, occupational, occupational hygiene behaviour, prevention, Coronacrisis-Taverne

Citation

Spee, T, Timmerman, J G, Rühl, R, Kersting, K, Heederik, D J J & Smit, L A M 2016, 'Determinants of epoxy allergy in the construction industry : a case-control study', Contact Dermatitis, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12529