Environmental security, politics and markets

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , Opschoor%20liber%202009.pdf (135.26 KB)
Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , Opschoor Figure 7.2.doc (27 KB)

Publication date

2009

Authors

Gaay Fortman, B. de

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

DOI

Document Type

Part of book or chapter of book

License

Abstract

While sustainable development has shown a remarkable degree of persistence and staying power as a concept, implementation of intragenerational as well as intergenerational equity remains as problematic as true universality of human rights. Notable is the Earth Charter that connects sustainability with justice, peace and participation, signed by more than 2000 civil society organizations, but not endorsed at an intergovernmental or governmental level. Hans Opschoor believes that this may well be connected with the inconvenience of the truth underlying it (Gore 2006), the incompatibility of the charter’s ethical direction with value systems such as free market libertarianism and its corresponding morally demanding character. To these constraints, Opschoor adds the Charter’s political inviability in terms of concrete implications. Hans Opschoor deserves wide acclaim as one whose work looks beyond the narrow boundaries of one (sub)discipline: a genuine political economist, focusing on not just problems, but solutions, and not afraid to tackle religious, cultural, political and social aspects of these as well. This chapter is an attempt to honour him by connecting the economic problem of sustainability with the politics of security.

Keywords

political economy, environmental security

Citation