Environmental security, politics and markets
Files
Publication date
2009
Authors
Gaay Fortman, B. de
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Part of book or chapter of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
While sustainable development has shown a remarkable degree of persistence
and staying power as a concept, implementation of intragenerational
as well as intergenerational equity remains as problematic as true
universality of human rights. Notable is the Earth Charter that connects
sustainability with justice, peace and participation, signed by more than
2000 civil society organizations, but not endorsed at an intergovernmental
or governmental level. Hans Opschoor believes
that this may well be connected with the inconvenience of the truth
underlying it (Gore 2006), the incompatibility of the charter’s ethical
direction with value systems such as free market libertarianism and
its corresponding morally demanding character. To these constraints,
Opschoor adds the Charter’s political inviability in terms of concrete
implications. Hans Opschoor deserves
wide acclaim as one whose work looks beyond the narrow boundaries
of one (sub)discipline: a genuine political economist, focusing on not
just problems, but solutions, and not afraid to tackle religious, cultural,
political and social aspects of these as well. This chapter is an attempt to
honour him by connecting the economic problem of sustainability with the politics of security.
Keywords
political economy, environmental security