Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Publication date

2019-08

Authors

Beks, R B
Peek, Jesse
de Jong, MB
van Wessem, KarlijnORCID 0000-0002-1166-0990ISNI 0000000393699019
Oner, F. CumhurORCID 0000-0003-0858-8243ISNI 0000000395222644
Hietbrink, FalcoISNI 0000000388513355
Leenen, L. P.H.ORCID 0000-0001-8385-1801ISNI 0000000390070047
Groenwold, Rolf H.H.ISNI 0000000394374611
Houwert, Roderick M.ISNI 0000000389377375

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to present current evidence on rib fixation and to compare effect estimates obtained from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched on June 16th 2017 for both RCTs and observational studies comparing rib fixation versus nonoperative treatment. The MINORS criteria were used to assess study quality. Where possible, data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcome measures were hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), pneumonia, and tracheostomy. Results: Thirty-three studies were included resulting in 5874 patients with flail chest or multiple rib fractures: 1255 received rib fixation and 4619 nonoperative treatment. Rib fixation for flail chest reduced mortality compared to nonoperative treatment with a risk ratio of 0.41 (95% CI 0.27, 0.61, p < 0.001, I 2 = 0%). Furthermore, rib fixation resulted in a shorter ILOS, DMV, lower pneumonia rate, and need for tracheostomy. Results from recent studies showed lower mortality and shorter DMV after rib fixation, but there were no significant differences for the other outcome measures. There was insufficient data to perform meta-analyses on rib fixation for multiple rib fractures. Pooled results from RCTs and observational studies were similar for all outcome measures, although results from RCTs showed a larger treatment effect for HLOS, ILOS, and DMV compared to observational studies. Conclusions: Rib fixation for flail chest improves short-term outcome, although the indication and patient subgroup who would benefit most remain unclear. There is insufficient data regarding treatment for multiple rib fractures. Observational studies show similar results compared with RCTs.

Keywords

Journal Article, Review, Flail chest, Multiple rib fractures, Operative treatment, Current evidence, Nonoperative treatment, Flail Chest/mortality, Tracheostomy/mortality, Respiration, Artificial/mortality, Humans, Middle Aged, Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data, Male, Fracture Fixation/methods, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Pneumonia/etiology, Conservative Treatment/methods, Critical Care/statistics & numerical data, Observational Studies as Topic, Female, Aged, Rib Fractures/mortality, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Meta-Analysis, Journal Article

Citation

Beks, R B, Peek, J, de Jong, M B, Wessem, K J P, Öner, C F, Hietbrink, F, Leenen, L P H, Groenwold, R H H & Houwert, R M 2019, 'Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures : current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis', European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 631-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-1020-x