National Transparency Regimes: Rules or Principles? A Comparative Analysis of the United States and The Netherlands
Publication date
2016-09-18
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Technology development and democratization have been identified as the general drivers of the worldwide thrust in transparency. But what transparency regimes do these drivers generate in different countries? This mixed method study indicates that national regimes are different due to pre-existing institutional differences and critical junctures in the historical development of transparency regimes. Our analysis shows that the U.S. transparency regime can be characterized as a rules-based approach while a principles-based transparency regime prevails in the Netherlands. This article nuances the debate about the global character of transparency and highlights two different outcomes of the push for transparency.
Keywords
Freedom of Information, Netherlands, Rules and Principles, Transparency regimes, United States, Public Administration, Business and International Management, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Citation
Ruijer, E & Meijer, A 2016, 'National Transparency Regimes : Rules or Principles? A Comparative Analysis of the United States and The Netherlands', International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1057343