Improving surgical outcomes following the Norwood procedure

Publication date

2011

Authors

Algra, Selma OISNI 0000000419445923
Breur, Johannes M P JISNI 0000000395622111
Evens, Fabiola C MISNI 0000000388481824
de Roo, F.ISNI 0000000395026651
Schoof, Paul HISNI 000000036926236X
Haas, F.ISNI 0000000015066070

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Background The Norwood procedure consists of three palliative operations, performed in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Especially the first stage (Norwood I) is associated with the highest mortality rates in paediatric cardiac surgery (up to 25%). During surgery, the aorta is reconstructed and a systemic-to-pulmonary shunt is applied. Originally the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt was used, but recently the right-ventricle-to-pulmonary-artery shunt is increasingly being employed. We reviewed the results of our operative strategy, where an individualised choice of shunt is made. Furthermore, attempts to reduce interstage mortality (between Norwood I and II) were assessed. Methods All neonates who underwent Norwood stage I palliation from August 2004 until November 2010 were included in this retrospective analysis. Mortality rates and management strategies were compared. Results Thirty-six patients were available for analysis. Overall 30-day mortality was 5.6% (2 patients) and interstage mortality after discharge was 14% (5 patients). In 2006, a novel clinical protocol was introduced, aimed at reduction of mortality during the interstage period. This resulted in reduction of interstage mortality from 23% to 9% (3 of 13 infants, versus 2 of 23), with a cumulative survival of 82% (maximum follow-up 4 years). Conclusion Early surgical results following the Norwood procedure using an individualised shunt choice are favourable.

Keywords

Citation

Algra, S O, Breur, J M P J, Evens, F C M, de Roo, F, Schoof, P H & Haas, F 2011, 'Improving surgical outcomes following the Norwood procedure', Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 19, pp. 369-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-011-0171-8