Delirium detection using EEG: What and how to measure

Publication date

2015-01-01

Authors

Van Der Kooi, Arendina W.
Zaal, Irene J.
Klijn, F. A MISNI 0000000391712582
Koek, Huiberdina LISNI 0000000395507172
Meijer, Ronald C.ISNI 0000000390008294
Leijten, FransORCID 0000-0003-2603-3364ISNI 0000000396446949
Slooter, Arjen J CORCID 0000-0003-0804-8378ISNI 0000000389035877

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Background: Despite its frequency and impact, delirium is poorly recognized in postoperative and critically ill patients. EEG is highly sensitive to delirium but, as currently used, it is not diagnostic. To develop an EEG-based tool for delirium detection with a limited number of electrodes, we determined the optimal electrode derivation and EEG characteristic to discriminate delirium from nondelirium. Methods: Standard EEGs were recorded in 28 patients with delirium and 28 age- and sexmatched patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgery and were not delirious, as classified by experts using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria. The first minute of artifact-free EEG data with eyes closed as well as with eyes open was selected. For each derivation, six EEG parameters were evaluated. Using Mann-Whitney U tests, all combinations of derivations and parameters were compared between patients with delirium and those without. Corresponding P values, corrected for multiple testing, were ranked. Results: The largest difference between patients with and without delirium and highest area under the receiver operating curve (0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00) was found during the eyes-closed periods of the EEG, using electrode derivation F8-Pz (frontal-parietal) and relative δ power (median [interquartile range (IQR)] for delirium, 0.59 [IQR, 0.47-0.71] and for nondelirium, 0.20 [IQR, 0.17-0.26]; P = .0000000000018). With a cutoffvalue of 0.37, it resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI, 88%-100%). Conclusions: In a homogenous population of nonsedated patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgery, we observed that relative d power from an eyes-closed EEG recording with only two electrodes in a frontal-parietal derivation can distinguish among patients who have delirium and those who do not.

Keywords

Taverne, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Citation

Van Der Kooi, A W, Zaal, I J, Klijn, F A, Koek, H L, Meijer, R C, Leijten, F S & Slooter, A J 2015, 'Delirium detection using EEG : What and how to measure', Chest, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-3050