The Development of Moral Reasoning in the Law Curriculum - An Exploration of Various Teaching Activities

Publication date

2022-03

Authors

van Dongen, E.G.D.ISNI 0000000419452277
Raaijmakers, S.F.ISNI 0000000475927556

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

unspecified

Abstract

Developing the capacity for moral judgment is an essential professional competence for lawyers. What teaching and learning activities in the law curriculum can be used in order to contribute to students’ moral reasoning and moral judgment? Four teaching methods were tried out in the period 2019 to 2021 at the Utrecht University School of Law: teaching methods that either work with (hypothetical) dilemmas (I); in-class reflection papers (II); experiential learning based on own experiences in a simulation situation (III); or clinical teaching in a real law firm (IV). The effects of these methods on the development of moral reasoning were measured using the Defining Issues Test (DIT). Additional information on the effectiveness and utility of the method was gathered using semi-structured interviews with teachers. The DIT results were compared at the beginning and at the end of the courses and related to the teaching methods. This article presents the outcomes of this study and formulates some recommendations for further research on the topic.

Keywords

moral reasoning, legal education, scholarship of teaching and learning, defining issues test

Citation

van Dongen, E & Raaijmakers, S 2022, 'The Development of Moral Reasoning in the Law Curriculum - An Exploration of Various Teaching Activities', Law and Method, vol. 2022, no. maart, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000066