Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?

Publication date

2018-04-04

Authors

Kleijnen, Jean Paul Johannes
van Asselen, BISNI 0000000391220676
Intven, Martijn PwORCID 0000-0002-5068-5517ISNI 0000000393019546
Burbach, J P Maarten
Philippens, Mariëlle E PORCID 0000-0003-0205-3459ISNI 0000000387302804
Lagendijk, J J WISNI 0000000393637862
Raaymakers, Bas WORCID 0000-0002-8036-6808ISNI 0000000392005337

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer patients that show a pathological complete response (pCR) after neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, have better prognosis. To increase pCR rates several studies escalate the tumor irradiation dose. However, due to lacking tumor contrast on online imaging techniques, no direct tumor setup can be performed and large boost margins are needed to ensure tumor coverage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of performing a setup on rectal wall for rectal cancer boost radiotherapy, thereby using rectal wall nearby the tumor as tumor position surrogate. METHODS: For sixteen patients, daily MRI's were performed during 1 week of radiotherapy. On each of these images, tumor and rectum were delineated. Residual displacements were determined per surface voxel after setup on bony anatomy or nearby rectal wall and setup errors for both setups were compared. Furthermore for every rectal wall voxel nearby the tumor, displacement was compared with the closest tumor point and correlation was determined. RESULTS: Mean (SD) setup error was 2.7 mm (3.3 mm) and 2.2 mm (3.2 mm) after setup on bony anatomy and rectal wall respectively. Nevertheless, similar PTV-margin estimates i.e. 95th percentile distances, were found; 8.0 mm. Also, a merely moderate correlation; ρ = 0.66 was found between rectal wall and tumor displacement. Further investigation into tumor and rectal mobility differences showed that the rectal wall lacks appropriate anatomical landmarks to find true displacements, especially to capture motion along the rectal wall. CONCLUSIONS: Setup on rectal wall slightly reduces mean setup errors but requires a similar PTV-margin as compared to setup on bony anatomy. Rectal mobility might be similar to tumor mobility, but due the absence of anatomical landmarks in the rectum, displacements along the rectal wall are not detected on current online imaging. Therefore, to further reduce tumor position uncertainties, direct or indirect online tumor visualization is needed.

Keywords

Dose escalation, MRI, Mobility, Setup, Rectal wall, Position surrogate, Rectal cancer, Tumor, GTV, Boost, Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Citation

Kleijnen, J-P J E, van Asselen, B, Intven, M, Burbach, J P M, Philippens, M E P, Lagendijk, J J W & Raaymakers, B W 2018, 'Does setup on rectal wall improve rectal cancer boost radiotherapy?', Radiation Oncology [E], vol. 13, no. 1, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1011-4