Risk factors for persistence of livestock-associated exposure in veal calf farmers and their family members: an observational longitudinal study
Publication date
2013
Authors
Dorado-Garcia, A.
Bos, M.E.H.
Graveland, H.
Cleef, B.A.G.L. van
Verstappen, K.M.H.W.
Kluytmans, J.A.J.W.
Wagenaar, J.A.
Heederik, D.J.J.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2013
Abstract
Objectives: Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) emergence is a
major public health concern. This study was aimed at
assessing risk factors for persistently carrying MRSA in
veal calf farmers and their family members. We also
evaluate the dynamics of MRSA environmental load
during the veal-calf production cycle.
Design: Observational, longitudinal, repeated crosssectional
study.
Setting: 52 veal calf farms in the Netherlands.
Participants: From the end of 2010 to the end of 2011,
a total of 211 farmers, family members and employees
were included in the study.
Primary outcome and secondary outcome
measures: Nasal swabs were taken from participants on
days 0, 4, 7 and week 12. A persistent MRSA carrier was
defined as a person positive for MRSA on days 0, 4 and
7. Participants filled in an extensive questionnaire to identify
potential risk factors and confounders. For estimation of
MRSA prevalence in calves and environmental
contamination, animal nasal swabs and Electrostatic Dust
Collectors were taken on day 0 and week 12.
Results: The presence of potential animal reservoirs
(free-ranging farm cats and sheep) and the level of
contact with veal calves was positively associated with
persistent MRSA carriage. Interestingly, at the end of the
study (week 12), there was a twofold rise in animal
prevalence and a significantly higher MRSA
environmental load in the stables was found on farms with
MRSA carriers.
Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that
environmental contamination with MRSA plays a role in the
acquisition of MRSA in farmers and their household
members and suggests that other animal species should
also be targeted to implement effective control strategies.