Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work: a scoping review of monitoring instruments

Publication date

2024-08-17

Authors

Boskma, Amber
van der Braak, KimORCID 0000-0003-4544-4628
Demenaga, Kiki
Idema, D. L.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-6025
Hooft, L.ISNI 0000000393460235
Wietasch, Götz
Franx, ArieISNI 0000000396875911
van der Laan, Maarten J.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Objective Nurses' and doctors' health at work is crucial for their overall performance and the quality of care they provide. The Jobs Demands Resources (JD-R) model offers a framework for health at work, encompassing â € job demands', â € job resources', â € personal resources', â € leadership', â € well-being' and â € outcomes'. While various instruments exist to measure health, an overview of instruments specifically designed for assessing nurses and doctors health is currently missing. This study provides a comprehensive overview of available health instruments specifically developed and validated for healthcare professionals in hospital care. Design Scoping review. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL. Eligibility criteria Studies assessing the health of nurses and/or doctors in hospitals using or evaluating instruments based on the JD-R model, published between January 2011 and January 2024, excluding student-exclusive samples. Data extraction and synthesis We extracted data on study and sample characteristics, as well as details of the measurement instruments, including main and subconstructs. Instruments were categorised based on the JD-R model domains. Descriptive analysis and data visualisation were performed using Excel and Python. Results We included 1204 studies, reporting 986 unique instruments. We identified 32 comprehensive instruments suitable for broad health screening, measuring four or more of the JD-R model domains. Additionally, we identified instruments focusing on specific domains for targeted screening needs. Furthermore, we present frequently reported instruments assumed to be extensively evaluated, user-friendly, accessible and available in multiple languages. Conclusions Health at work cannot be determined by a single instrument alone, underscoring the multidimensional nature of workplace health. Alternatively, organisations should select instruments based on domains most relevant and applicable to their context. This approach ensures a more comprehensive assessment of health at work.

Keywords

burnout, professional, mental health, occupational stress, risk management, General Medicine

Citation

Boskma, A, Braak, K, Demenaga, K, Idema, D, Hooft, L, Wietasch, G, Franx, A & van der Laan, M J 2024, 'Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work : a scoping review of monitoring instruments', BMJ Open, vol. 14, no. 8, e079861. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079861