SPONGE-assisted versus Trendelenburg position surgery in laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery (SPONGE trial): randomized clinical trial

Publication date

2022-11-01

Authors

Fahim, Milad
Couwenberg, Alice
Verweij, M E
Dijksman, Lea M
Verkooijen, Helena M.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-1623
Smits, Anke B

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Background: In minimally invasive surgery of the sigmoid colon and rectum a retractor sponge has been introduced as an alternative to the Trendelenburg position. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) compared postoperative duration of hospital stay and perioperative outcomes in patients with sigmoid or rectal cancer undergoing sponge-assisted versus Trendelenburg position surgery. Methods: The SPONGE trial is a single-centre RCT nested within the Dutch nationwide prospective observational cohort of patients with colorectal cancer, and follows the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design. Patients with sigmoid or rectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic surgery were randomized to either sponge-assisted or Trendelenburg surgery on a 1:1 basis using block randomization. Duration of postoperative hospital stay was the primary outcome and was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of complications, readmissions, or mortality versus the χ 2 test in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. This trial was not blinded for patients in the intervention arm or physicians. Results: Between November 2015 and June 2021, 82 patients were randomized to sponge-assisted surgery and 81 to Trendelenburg surgery. After post-randomization exclusion, 150 patients remained for analyses (75 patients per arm). There was no statistically significant difference in median duration of hospital stay (5 days versus 4 days, respectively; P = 0.06), 30-day postoperative complications (30 per cent versus 31 per cent; P = 1.00), readmission rate (8 per cent versus 15 per cent; P = 0.30), or mortality (0 per cent versus 1 per cent, P = 1.00). The per-protocol analysis showed similar results. No adverse device events were seen. Conclusion: Sponge-assisted laparoscopic/robotic surgery does not reduce the duration of hospital stay, or perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Keywords

Colon, Sigmoid, Head-Down Tilt, Humans, Laparoscopy/methods, Length of Stay, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Rectal Neoplasms/complications, Rectum, Treatment Outcome, Taverne, General Medicine, Observational Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Journal Article

Citation

Fahim, M, Couwenberg, A, Verweij, M E, Dijksman, L M, Verkooijen, H M & Smits, A B 2022, 'SPONGE-assisted versus Trendelenburg position surgery in laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery (SPONGE trial) : randomized clinical trial', The British journal of surgery, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 1081-1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac249