Risk Stratification in Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Residual Cardiovascular Risk with Current Secondary Prevention

Publication date

2021

Authors

Gynnild, Mari Nordbø
Hageman, Steven H J
Dorresteijn, Jannick A NORCID 0000-0002-0190-8526ISNI 0000000419437536
Spigset, Olav
Lydersen, Stian
Wethal, Torgeir
Saltvedt, Ingvild
Visseren, Frank L.J.ISNI 0000000389493675
Ellekjær, Hanne

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

PURPOSE: Suboptimal secondary prevention in patients with stroke causes a remaining cardiovascular risk desirable to reduce. We have validated a prognostic model for secondary preventive settings and estimated future cardiovascular risk and theoretical benefit of reaching guideline recommended risk factor targets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SMART-REACH (Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease-Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) model for 10-year and lifetime risk of cardiovascular events was applied to 465 patients in the Norwegian Cognitive Impairment After Stroke (Nor-COAST) study, a multicenter observational study with two-year follow-up by linkage to national registries for cardiovascular disease and mortality. The residual risk when reaching recommended targets for blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking cessation and antithrombotics was estimated. RESULTS: In total, 11.2% had a new event. Calibration plots showed adequate agreement between estimated and observed 2-year prognosis (C-statistics 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.71). Median estimated 10-year risk of recurrent cardiovascular events was 42% (Interquartile range (IQR) 32-54%) and could be reduced to 32% by optimal guideline-based therapy. The corresponding numbers for lifetime risk were 70% (IQR 63-76%) and 61%. We estimated an overall median gain of 1.4 (IQR 0.2-3.4) event-free life years if guideline targets were met. CONCLUSION: Secondary prevention was suboptimal and residual risk remains elevated even after optimization according to current guidelines. Considerable interindividual variation in risk exists, with a corresponding variation in benefit from intensification of treatment. The SMART-REACH model can be used to identify patients with the largest benefit from more intensive treatment and follow-up.

Keywords

Cardiovascular diseases, Ischemic stroke, Risk assessment, Risk factors, Risks and benefits, Secondary prevention, risk assessment, risks and benefits, risk factors, secondary prevention, cardiovascular diseases, ischemic stroke, Epidemiology, Journal Article

Citation

Gynnild, M N, Hageman, S H J, Dorresteijn, J A N, Spigset, O, Lydersen, S, Wethal, T, Saltvedt, I, Visseren, F L J & Ellekjær, H 2021, 'Risk Stratification in Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Residual Cardiovascular Risk with Current Secondary Prevention', Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 13, pp. 813-823. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S322779