The Diplomatic Viol
Publication date
2018-01
Editors
Ramel, Frédéric
Prévost-Thomas, Cécile
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
In this chapter, I argue that musical instruments themselves could enable, embody, and model diplomatic practice. My starting point is a curious comment from a 1740 publication, in which the sound of the bass viol is described as “resembling an Ambassador’s tone of voice, which is not loud, and is even a little nasal.” Tracing the history of the viol—the instrument of elite sociability in the long eighteenth century—also means tracing the history of diplomacy as it became a regular system of communication between (modernizing) states. I focus on three points of interaction. First, I demonstrate that learning the viol aided in developing the comportment necessary to an ambassador. Second, viols themselves were constructed of materials procured through diplomatic work—of negotiating long-distance trade, of maintaining or obtaining status as a colonial power. Lastly, considering that sound was an essential component of the symbolic language of diplomacy, the quiet tone of the viol could provide a model for negotiators. Above all, it is the sound of intimacy: of intimacy with the sovereign, of the intimate conversations that more frequently concluded negotiations than any staged congress could. As Le Blanc’s comment indicates, ambassadors—and diplomacy itself—had a tone.
Keywords
Taverne
Citation
Ahrendt, R S 2018, The Diplomatic Viol. in F Ramel & C Prévost-Thomas (eds), International Relations, Music and Diplomacy : Sounds and Voices on the International Stage. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63163-9_5