Comparative analysis of basidiomycete transcriptomes reveals a core set of expressed genes encoding plant biomass degrading enzymes

Publication date

2018-03

Authors

Peng, MaoISNI 0000000507288104
Aguilar-Pontes, Maria Victoria
Hainaut, Matthieu
Henrissat, Bernard
Hilden, Kristiina
Makela, Miia R.
de Vries, RonaldISNI 0000000391144204

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Basidiomycete fungi can degrade a wide range of plant biomass, including living and dead trees, forest litter, crops, and plant matter in soils. Understanding the process of plant biomass decay by basidiomycetes could facilitate their application in various industrial sectors such as food & feed, detergents and biofuels, and also provide new insights into their essential biological role in the global carbon cycle. The fast expansion of basidiomycete genomic and functional genomics data (e.g. transcriptomics, proteomics) has facilitated exploration of key genes and regulatory mechanisms of plant biomass degradation. In this study, we comparatively analyzed 22 transcriptome datasets from basidiomycetes related to plant biomass degradation, and identified 328 commonly induced genes and 318 repressed genes, and defined a core set of carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes), which was shared by most of the basidiomycete species. High conservation of these CAZymes in genomes and similar regulation pattern in transcriptomics data from lignocellulosic substrates indicate their key role in plant biomass degradation and need for their further biochemical investigation.

Keywords

Basidiomycete, Plant biomass degradation, Comparative transcriptomics, CAZymes, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG 15 - Life on Land

Citation

Peng, M, Aguilar-Pontes, M V, Hainaut, M, Henrissat, B, Hilden, K, Makela, M R & de Vries, R P 2018, 'Comparative analysis of basidiomycete transcriptomes reveals a core set of expressed genes encoding plant biomass degrading enzymes', Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 112, pp. 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2017.08.001