Conditionality vs. Autonomy: What Works Best in Social Assistance?

Publication date

2020-12-31

Authors

Verlaat, T.L.L.ORCID 0000-0003-2522-8813ISNI 0000000492808815
Rosenkranz, S.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-7913ISNI 0000000045822850
Groot, LoekORCID 0000-0002-0837-3755ISNI 000000011443668X
Sanders, M.W.J.L.ISNI 0000000036645223

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/workingpaper/preprint
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

We study the impacts of reducing conditionality for social assistance recipients through a field experiment in the Netherlands. Treated subjects received an exemption from job search requirements, monitoring, and sanctions or intensive counseling personalized to their needs and wishes. We find that exemption increases the probabilities of employment and self-sufficiency and improves reemployment quality. The effects of counseling are less pronounced and statistically insignificant. Using surveys, we find positive effects on experienced autonomy but no evidence of effects on job search behavior, social participation, health, and well-being. Our findings shed new light on the trade-off between autonomy and conditionality in social welfare.

Keywords

Welfare, RCT, Minimum Income Guarantee, Social Assistance, Policy Evaluation, SDG 1 - No Poverty, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth

Citation

Verlaat, T, Rosenkranz, S, Groot, L F M & Sanders, M 2020 'Conditionality vs. Autonomy: What Works Best in Social Assistance?' SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3720953