Bayes and the Evidence Base: Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus

de Grooth, Harm-Jan; Cremer, Olaf L

doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP

Bayes and the Evidence Base: Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus

Files

de-grooth-cremer-2024-bayes-and-the-evidence-base-reana... (507.77 KB)

Publication date

2024-03-01

Authors

de Grooth, Harm-Jan

Cremer, Olaf L.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP

Document Type

Article

Metadata

Show full item record

Collections

UMC Repository

License

cc_by

Keywords

Journal Article

Citation

de Grooth, H-J & Cremer, O L 2024, 'Bayes and the Evidence Base : Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus', American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 209, no. 5, pp. 483-484. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/1874/450627

Bayes and the Evidence Base: Re-Analyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus

Files

Publication date

Authors

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

DOI

Document Type

Metadata

Collections

License

Abstract

Keywords

Citation

URI