Minor surgery in general practice and effects on referrals to hospital care: observational study.
Publication date
2011
Authors
Dijk, C.E. van
Verheij, R.A.
Spreeuwenberg, P.
Groenewegen, P.P.
Bakker, D.H. de
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2011
Abstract
Background: Strengthening primary care is the focus of many countries, as national healthcare systems with a
strong primary care sector tend to have lower healthcare costs. However, it is unknown to what extent general
practitioners (GPs) that perform more services generate fewer hospital referrals. The objective of this study was to
examine the association between the number of surgical interventions and hospital referrals.
Methods: Data were derived from electronic medical records of 48 practices that participated in the Netherlands
Information Network of General Practice (LINH) in 2006-2007. For each care-episode of benign neoplasm skin/
nevus, sebaceous cyst or laceration/cut it was determined whether the patient was referred to a medical specialist
and/or minor surgery was performed. Multilevel multinomial regression analyses were used to determine the
relation between minor surgery and hospital referrals on the level of the GP-practice.
Results: Referral rates differed between diagnoses, with 1.0% of referrals for a laceration/cut, 8.2% for a sebaceous
cyst and 10.2% for benign neoplasm skin/nevus. The GP practices performed minor surgery for a laceration/cut in
8.9% (SD:14.6) of the care-episodes, for a benign neoplasm skin/nevus in 27.4% (SD:14.4) of cases and for a
sebaceous cyst in 26.4% (SD:13.8). GP practices that performed more minor surgery interventions had a lower
referral rate for patients with a laceration/cut (-0.38; 95%CI:-0.60- -0.11) and those with a sebaceous cyst (-0.42; 95%
CI:-0.63- -0.16), but not for people with benign neoplasm skin/nevus (-0.26; 95%CI:-0.51-0.03). However, the absolute
difference in referral rate appeared to be relevant only for sebaceous cysts.
Conclusions: The effects of minor surgery vary between diagnoses. Minor surgery in general practice appears to
be a substitute for specialist medical care only in relation to sebaceous cysts. Measures to stimulate minor surgery
for sebaceous cysts may induce substitution.