A traditional lawyer’s perspective on the importance of ELS for legal scholarship

Publication date

2018-06-29

Authors

Crijns, Jan H.
Giesen, I.ORCID 0000-0002-5163-1860ISNI 0000000033871057
Voermans, Wim

Editors

van Boom, Willem H.
Desmet, Pieter
Mascini, Peter

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

This chapter addresses the possible contributions and limitations of empirical research for legal research in the domains of private law, criminal law and constitutional and administrative law. The authors do this to gain a better insight in the nature of legal research and – based on that – to try to inspire legal scholars to embrace and possibly engage in empirical research themselves, to enrich their work. After a general introduction, some of the peculiarities of legal research are dealt with, offering a possible explanation for the seemingly slow reception of empirical scholarship within legal research. Next, the possibilities and the pros and cons of empirical research methods for the three legal domains covered are dealt with. The chapter takes a special look at the empirical research methods that are dealt with elsewhere in this volume and discusses the possibilities and limitations of these methods for legal research in the three legal domains covered.

Keywords

ELS, legal scholarship, private law, Taverne, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

Crijns, J H, Giesen, I & Voermans, W 2018, A traditional lawyer’s perspective on the importance of ELS for legal scholarship. in W H van Boom, P Desmet & P Mascini (eds), Empirical Legal Research in Action : Reflections on Methods and their Applications. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 227–262. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785362750.00012