Sweeter than honey: Are Gmail accounts associated with greater rewards at a higher risk of hijacking?

Publication date

2024-05

Authors

Stibbe, Danielle
Ruiter, StijnISNI 0000000369949794
Steenbeek, W.ISNI 000000039485296X
Moneva, Asier

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigates the effect of advertised rewards in credential leaks on the likelihood and speed of account hijacking. Methods: In an online field experiment, we created 176 honey Gmail accounts and randomly assigned them to eight different posts containing account credential leaks. We used a 2 × 2 experimental design, manipulating two key variables within the post titles: the number of accounts (5 K or 1.5 M) and the promise of access to additional platforms (absent or present). We then monitored the accounts for any subsequent activity. Results: Our findings indicate that the promise of access to additional platforms increased the likelihood and speed of an attempted access. Only 12 accounts were fully accessed, however, because most hijackers did not complete the second-factor authentication (2FA) process required for gaining full access. It seems that the 2FA acted as a deterrent to complete Gmail account hijacking. Conclusions: The study aligns with the rational choice perspective of crime, showing that the prospect of greater rewards leads to more attempted account accesses. Pre-registration: https://osf.io/9y26z.

Keywords

Account hijacking, Cybercriminal decision-making, Hacker forums, Honey accounts, Personal data theft, Rational choice perspective, Target selection, Neuroscience (miscellaneous), Applied Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence

Citation

Stibbe, D, Ruiter, S, Steenbeek, W & Moneva, A 2024, 'Sweeter than honey : Are Gmail accounts associated with greater rewards at a higher risk of hijacking?', Computers in Human Behavior Reports, vol. 14, 100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100410