Not leaving your unsatisfactory job: analyzing female, migrant, elderly and lower-educated employees

Publication date

2024-02-06

Authors

Mandemakers, LuukISNI 0000000524157050
Jaspers, EvaORCID 0000-0002-8589-5899ISNI 0000000387796170
van der Lippe, TanjaISNI 0000000110074407

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Purpose: Employees facing challenges in their careers – i.e. female, migrant, elderly and lower-educated employees – might expect job searches to have a low likelihood of success and might therefore more often stay in unsatisfactory positions. The goal of this study is to discover inequalities in job mobility for these employees. Design/methodology/approach: We rely on a large sample of Dutch public sector employees (N = 30,709) and study whether employees with challenges in their careers are hampered in translating job dissatisfaction into job searches. Additionally, we assess whether this is due to their perceptions of labor market alternatives. Findings: Findings show that non-Western migrant, elderly and lower-educated employees are less likely to act on job dissatisfaction than their advantaged counterparts, whereas women are more likely than men to do so. Additionally, we find that although they perceive labor market opportunities as limited, this does not affect their propensity to search for different jobs. Originality/value: This paper is novel in discovering inequalities in job mobility by analyzing whether employees facing challenges in their careers are less likely to act on job dissatisfaction and therefore more likely to remain in unsatisfactory positions.

Keywords

Career challenges, Job dissatisfaction, Job search, Perceived labor market alternatives, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth

Citation

Mandemakers, L, Jaspers, E & van der Lippe, T 2024, 'Not leaving your unsatisfactory job : analyzing female, migrant, elderly and lower-educated employees', Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2023-0223