Small day 8 equine embryos cannot be rescued by a less advanced recipient mare uterus

Publication date

2019-03-01

Authors

Cuervo-Arango, J
Claes, A.ISNI 0000000492848729
Stout, T.A.E.ORCID 0000-0001-5321-8095ISNI 0000000387838262

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Equine embryos tolerate an unusually large degree of negative uterine asynchrony (recipient mare up to 5 days behind the donor mare). By contrast, positive asynchrony of more than 2 days results in a high incidence of early embryonic loss (EEL). Day 8 embryos range in diameter from approximately 130-1300 μm, with embryos smaller than 300 μm reported to suffer an increased incidence of EEL. However, it is not known whether this reduced viability is due to intrinsically poor embryo quality, or to inadvertent recipient uterine stage-embryo (positive) asynchrony. To examine whether small embryos survive better in Day 4-5 recipients than in recipients with a more advanced uterine stage, the likelihood of pregnancy (PR) and EEL for 62 small (<300 μm) and 215 larger Day 8 horse embryos were compared after transfer to recipients at different uterine stages (Days 4-5, 6-7 and 8-9) using logistic regression. Overall, EEL was higher (21.2%; P < 0.05) for small than larger embryos (7.1%). However, neither PR nor EEL were influenced by the recipient's uterine stage at the time of transfer (P > 0.1). The EEL for small embryos transferred into Day 4-5, 6-7 and 8-9 recipients was 20.8, 18.7 and 25.0%, respectively. We conclude that embryos recovered on Day 8 with a diameter <300 μm are at increased risk of EEL due to reasons other than inadvertent positive asynchrony with the recipient mare's uterus.

Keywords

Horse, Embryo diameter, Embryo-donor asynchrony, Early embryonic loss, Recipient mare, Taverne

Citation

Cuervo-Arango, J, Claes, A N & Stout, T A E 2019, 'Small day 8 equine embryos cannot be rescued by a less advanced recipient mare uterus', Theriogenology, vol. 126, pp. 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.11.026