Niches after cesarean section in a population seeking hysteroscopic sterilization
Publication date
2017-07-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Objective To study the prevalence of hysteroscopically evaluated disruptions of the integrity of the uterine wall (‘niches’) in women with and without a previous cesarean section. Study design A prospective cohort study was performed in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Women seeking hysteroscopic sterilization were included. A hysteroscopic evaluation of the anterior wall of the uterus and cervix to identify the existence of disruptions (niches) was performed in a standard manner. Primary outcome was the presence of a uterine niche, defined as any visible defect, disruption, or concavity (gap) in the anterior wall. Secondary outcome was to develop a registration form of niche features for hysteroscopic evaluation. Results In total, 713 women were included, 603 without and 110 with a previous cesarean section. In women with a previous cesarean Section 83 (75%) niches were observed using hysteroscopy. Anterior wall disruptions were not observed in women without a cesarean section. The following niche features were identified and incorporated in a registration form: polyps, cysts, myometrium defect, fibrotic tissue, (abnormal) vascular pattern, lateral branches, mucus production inside the defect, and bleeding. Conclusion In a prospective cohort study among women undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization, a uterine niche could be detected by hysteroscopy in 75% of women with a previous cesarean section.
Keywords
Cesarean section, Hysteroscopy, Niche, Scar defect, Taverne, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Citation
Voet, L L F V D, Limperg, T, Veersema, S, Timmermans, A M, Bij de Vaate, A M J, Brölmann, H A M & Huirne, J A F 2017, 'Niches after cesarean section in a population seeking hysteroscopic sterilization', European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 214, pp. 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.05.004