Inconsistency in student achievement across subject domains: examination of associations with students’ gender, socioeconomic status, and teachers’ track recommendations

Publication date

2024-07

Authors

van Leest, AnneISNI 000000049285992X
van de Pol, JannekeISNI 0000000394381133
van Tartwijk, JanORCID 0000-0001-6804-4163ISNI 000000039699286X
Hornstra, LisetteORCID 0000-0001-5873-7409ISNI 0000000419556412

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

For students who perform inconsistently across subjects, teachers face challenges in formulating track recommendations, as their achievement will not point to one secondary school track. This issue may be more prominent for students from diverse backgrounds, given the achievement differences between specific subject domains within these groups. Therefore, we examined the impact of achievement inconsistency (by comparing standardised achievement levels between reading comprehension and mathematics within students) on students’ track recommendations in the Dutch educational system (N = 4,248). Most student perform rather consistently. Approximately 20% of the students performed inconsistently (>1 SD difference between subjects). While the overall effect of inconsistency on track recommendations was small, achievement inconsistency primarily seemed to affect track recommendations when the inconsistency was moderate to large. Teachers formulated more “careful” (i.e., lower) track recommendations when the inconsistency was large. This effect was slightly more pronounced for higher-SES students, with no gender differences.

Keywords

achievement inconsistency, gender, mathematics, reading comprehension, SES, track recommendations, Transition from primary to secondary education, Education

Citation

van Leest, A, van de Pol, J, van Tartwijk, J & Hornstra, L 2024, 'Inconsistency in student achievement across subject domains : examination of associations with students’ gender, socioeconomic status, and teachers’ track recommendations', Educational Research and Evaluation, vol. 29, no. 5-6, pp. 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2345197