Beat-to-beat variability in preload unmasks latent risk of Torsade de Pointes in anesthetized chronic atrioventricular block dogs

Publication date

2016

Authors

Stams, Thom R G
Oosterhoff, Peter
Heijdel, Atty
Dunnink, Albert
Beekman, JMISNI 0000000388915338
van der Nagel, Roel
van Rijen, HVMISNI 0000000395224711
van der Heyden, MAGORCID 0000-0002-4225-7942ISNI 0000000391802748
Vos, M AISNI 0000000395825015

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Background:Beat-to-beat variability in ventricular repolarization (BVR) associates with increased arrhythmic risk. Proarrhythmic remodeling in the dog with chronic AV-block (CAVB) compromises repolarization reserve and associates with increased BVR, which further increases upon dofetilide infusion and correlates with Torsade de Pointes (TdP) arrhythmias. It was hypothesized that these pro-arrhythmia-associated increases in BVR are induced by beat-to-beat variability in preload.Methods and Results:Left ventricular monophasic action potential duration (LVMAPD) was recorded in acute (AAVB) and CAVB dogs, before and after dofetilide infusion. BVR was quantified as short-term variability of LVMAPD. The PQ-interval was controlled by pacing: either a constant or an alternating preload pattern was established, verified by PV-loop. The effect of the stretch-activated channel blocker, streptomycin, on BVR was evaluated in a second CAVB group. At alternating preload only, BVR was increased after proarrhythmic remodeling (0.45±0.14 ms AAVB vs. 2.2±1.1 ms CAVB, P

Keywords

Electrical remodeling, Preload, Short-term variability of repolarization, Stretch, Torsade de Pointes, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Journal Article

Citation

Stams, T R G, Oosterhoff, P, Heijdel, A, Dunnink, A, Beekman, J D M, van der Nagel, R, van Rijen, H V M, van der Heyden, M A G & Vos, M A 2016, 'Beat-to-beat variability in preload unmasks latent risk of Torsade de Pointes in anesthetized chronic atrioventricular block dogs', Circulation journal, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1336-1345. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1335