A less detailed job axis in a quantitative job-exposure matrix results in a similar exposure-response association
Files
Publication date
2025-05-18
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Quantitative job-exposure matrices (JEMs) have been developed to assign exposure using International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO)-68 coded job information. For extended compatibility with the less detailed ISCO-88 coding, a quantitative JEM using the same underlying model was developed. We compared exposure-response relationships between cumulative respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and lung cancer risk using a quantitative JEM based on ISCO-88 (88-JEM) and ISCO-68 (68-JEM). METHODS: Based on a common set of approximately 15 000 RCS measurements, job-specific, region-specific and time-specific exposure levels were estimated for the 88-JEM and the 68-JEM and linked to participants' job histories. Exposure-response relationships in an international lung cancer case-control study were analysed by logistic regression and generalised additive models. RESULTS: The 88-JEM and the 68-JEM yielded similar RCS-lung cancer associations, with elevated lung cancer risks across each cumulative exposure quartile. The 88-JEM exhibited a minor not statistically significant upward bend in the exposure-response curve at higher exposures. CONCLUSION: To accurately detect associations between disease risk and occupational exposure, quantitative JEMs can be applied in community-based studies that provide job histories in either ISCO-88 or ISCO-68.
Keywords
Epidemiology, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Materials, exposures or occupational groups, Risk assessment, Silicosis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Ohlander, J, Peters, S & Kromhout, H 2025, 'A less detailed job axis in a quantitative job-exposure matrix results in a similar exposure-response association', Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 157-160. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2024-109702