Beslissen om niet te reanimeren : een medisch en ethisch vraagstuk
Publication date
1993-05-27
Authors
Delden, J.J.M. van
Editors
Advisors
Schroten, E.
Maas, P.J. van der
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Dissertation
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
The fight against an untimely death is an element of medical science which
comes to the fore especially with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A successful
resuscitation constitutes a victory over death. Hence modem resuscitation
techniques are considered one of the breakthroughs which advanced
medical science has offered humanity. The importance of resuscitation is
reinforeed by the fact that everyone eventually dies. For everyone there is
the moment when heartbeat and/or respiration fails. Thus all humanity is a
possible candidate for resuscitation.
However, resuscitation has its drawbacks. Resuscitation is more often
than not unsuccessful and practising it involves some technical violence.
When the resuscitation attempt is not successful, than the process of dying
can be severely disturbed while nothing positive can be attributed to the
intervention. Moreover, not for all people death needs to be fought with all
possible force. In short, somelimes it is better not to resuscitate at all. The
question which then needs to be faced is 'when not to resuscitate?'. This
question is the subject of the present dissertation.
An added problem is the fact that the decision to resuscitate needs to be
taken quickly. Hence the question 'should this patient be resuscitated or
not?' must be answered when there is time to think it over. When this kind
of decision-making process leads to the decision not to intervene, a DO
NOT RESUSCITATE-decision has been taken. The central issue of this
thesis is: Which grounds allow a DNR-decision to be taken. This matter
derives its moral importance from the fact that by taking a DNR-decision
one takes the responsibility that the decision may shorten a patient's life.
The objective of this study is not limited to a norrnalive analysis of the
reasons not to resuscitate. The aim is to offer some considerations with
which to fonnulate a DNR-policy as well. In another aspect the study is
limited: the answers to the questions poscd are aimed at taking DNR-decisions
in hospitals and for patients who have reached majority.