Defending water and life: domestic ecologies and social reproduction in Buenaventura
Publication date
2025
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
During the last four decades, communities in the city of Buenaventura, Colombia’s main seaport, have mobilized in order to access public water services. Privatization, poor infrastructural maintenance, and intermittence have made access to water a matter of concern. In this context, the Committee for the Defense of Water and Life came into being in 2014, as an urban grassroots organization, making calls on the city’s population to mobilize for their right to clean water. In this article, however, we argue that the acts of defending water are not limited to the realm of collective action and overt activism against national and local governmental decisions. Rather, defending water in places such as Buenaventura is also an everyday gendered practice where water is secured and protected against other beings such as microbes and/or mosquitoes. Drawing on collaborative work, we document how women protect water in less visible scenarios such as the home. These women engage in a repertoire of domestic activities and techniques in order to obtain, store and keep water clean, as stored (and therefore stagnant) waters are never only water but are also home to large and threatening communities of organisms such as microbes and mosquitoes on their water stages. We bring political ecology indoors to reflect on how gendered domestic spaces become a dynamic and crucial ecological and political arena for the defense of water and life.
Keywords
domestic ecologies, mosquito-borne diseases, political ecology, social reproduction, stored water, Water, Taverne, Gender Studies, Demography, Cultural Studies, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Citation
Acevedo-Guerrero, T, Camargo, A, Roa-García, C E & Roa-García, M C 2025, 'Defending water and life : domestic ecologies and social reproduction in Buenaventura', Gender, Place and Culture, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 543-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2024.2366229