The influence of baseline risk on the relation between HbA1c and risk for new cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic cardiovascular disease

Publication date

2016-07-19

Authors

Bots, Sophie H.
van der Graaf, Y.ISNI 0000000388026709
Nathoe, Hendrik M.ISNI 0000000387930624
de Borst, Gert JISNI 0000000396922458
Kappelle, JaapISNI 0000000389941458
Visseren, Frank L.J.ISNI 0000000389493675
Westerink, J.ISNI 0000000388385904
SMART Study Group

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strict glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes has proven to have microvascular benefits while the effects on CVD and mortality are less clear, especially in high risk patients. Whether strict glycaemic control would reduce the risk of future CVD or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing CVD, is unknown. This study aims to evaluate whether the relation between baseline HbA1c and new cardiovascular events or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) is modified by baseline vascular risk. METHODS: A cohort of 1096 patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease (SMART) study was followed. The relation between HbA1c at baseline and future vascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular mortality) and all-cause mortality was evaluated with Cox proportional hazard analyses in a population that was stratified for baseline risk for vascular events as calculated with the SMART risk score. The mean follow-up duration was 6.9 years for all-cause mortality and 6.4 years for vascular events, in which period 243 and 223 cases were reported, respectively. RESULTS: A 1 % increase in HbA1c was associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.06-1.31). This association was also found in the highest SMART risk quartile (HR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.11-1.60). There was no relation between HbA1c and the occurrence of cardiovascular events during follow-up (HR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.91-1.16). The interaction term between HbA1c and SMART risk score was not significantly related to any of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD, HbA1c is related to the risk of all-cause mortality, but not to the risk of cardiovascular events. The relation between HbA1c and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and vascular disease is not dependent on baseline vascular risk.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease, Glycaemic control, HbA1c, High risk population, Type 2 diabetes, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Journal Article

Citation

Bots, S H, van der Graaf, Y, Nathoe, H M W, de Borst, G J, Kappelle, J L, Visseren, F L J, Westerink, J & SMART Study Group 2016, 'The influence of baseline risk on the relation between HbA1c and risk for new cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic cardiovascular disease', Cardiovascular Diabetology [E], vol. 15, no. 1, 15:101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0418-1