Event Structure without Naïve Physics
Files
Publication date
2019-03-21
Editors
Truswell, Robert
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
What is the real nature of the aspectual division between perfective and imperfective as revealed by the well-known in/for-test? The answer is founded on the idea that this division between completion and incompletion mirrors our cognitive capacity to shift between discreteness and continuity as expressed in the number systems N and R. To get at the real contribution of a verb to aspectual information, the first step is to determine the basic atemporal building block making a tenseless verb stative or non-stative. For this, verbhood is to be understood aspectually in a very strict way abstracting from the contribution of arguments. It follows that one has to get ‘below’ event structure in order to see why the in/for-test works as it turns out to do (or in some cases not).
Keywords
In/for-test, binary tense, naïve physics, compositionality, discretization, temporality, perfectivity, splitting PROG, degree achievement verbs, type logic, Taverne
Citation
Verkuyl, H J 2019, Event Structure without Naïve Physics. in R Truswell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Event Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 171-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.8