Event Structure without Naïve Physics

Publication date

2019-03-21

Authors

Verkuyl, H.J.ISNI 0000000108747174

Editors

Truswell, Robert

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

What is the real nature of the aspectual division between perfective and imperfective as revealed by the well-known in/for-test? The answer is founded on the idea that this division between completion and incompletion mirrors our cognitive capacity to shift between discreteness and continuity as expressed in the number systems N and R. To get at the real contribution of a verb to aspectual information, the first step is to determine the basic atemporal building block making a tenseless verb stative or non-stative. For this, verbhood is to be understood aspectually in a very strict way abstracting from the contribution of arguments. It follows that one has to get ‘below’ event structure in order to see why the in/for-test works as it turns out to do (or in some cases not).

Keywords

In/for-test, binary tense, naïve physics, compositionality, discretization, temporality, perfectivity, splitting PROG, degree achievement verbs, type logic, Taverne

Citation

Verkuyl, H J 2019, Event Structure without Naïve Physics. in R Truswell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Event Structure. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 171-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.8