Influence of pitch dimensions on non-native tone perception by Dutch and Mandarin listeners

Publication date

2018

Authors

Hu, ShuangshuangISNI 0000000523803225
Chen, A.O.ISNI 0000000419520081
Kager, R.W.J.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-839XISNI 0000000110640747

Editors

Mixdorff, Hansjörg

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that listeners of different language backgrounds attend to different pitch dimensions when perceiving non-native tones by acoustic approaches. The present study investigated which dimensions of pitch, namely, pitch contour, pitch level, together with the position where it occurs in a word, influenced non-native tone perception by tone language (Mandarin) and non-tone language (Dutch) listeners at the phonological level. A sequence-recall task with memory load and high phonetic variability was applied in the study. Language specific perceptual patterns were found for the two groups. Mandarin listeners outperformed Dutch listeners on encoding non-native pitch contour and pitch level contrasts on each position. Overall Mandarin listeners‟ perception of non-native tones was independent on the position. However, they needed contextual tonal references when encoding non-native pitch level contrasts. Dutch listeners showed perceptual difficulties in encoding pitch contrasts phonologically and were found partially “tone deaf” due to the lack of representations of contrastive tonal categories in their native language. They showed an overall preference for the word final position than word initial and word middle position when perceiving non-native tones.

Keywords

cross-linguistic tone perception, phonological perception, pitch dimensions

Citation

Hu, S, Chen, A O & Kager, R W J 2018, Influence of pitch dimensions on non-native tone perception by Dutch and Mandarin listeners. in H Mixdorff (ed.), Proceedings of TAL 2018 : Sixth International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages. vol. 6, International Speech Communication Association, pp. 252–255. https://doi.org/10.21437/TAL.2018