Living in the Past or Living in the Future? Analyzing Parties' Platform Change In-between Elections, The Netherlands 1997-2014
Files
Publication date
2018
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Do parties change their platform in anticipation of electoral losses? Or do parties respond to experienced losses at the previous election? These questions relate to two mechanisms to align public opinion with party platforms: (1) rational anticipation, and (2) electoral performance. While extant work empirically tested, and found support for, the latter mechanism, the effect of rational anticipation has not been put to an empirical test yet. We contribute to the literature on party platform change by theorizing and assessing how party performance motivates parties to change their platform in-between elections. We built a new and unique dataset of >20,000 press releases issued by 15 Dutch national political parties that were in parliament between 1997 and 2014. Utilizing automated text analysis (topic modeling) to measure parties’ platform change, we show that electoral defeat motivates party platform change in-between elections. In line with existing findings, we demonstrate that parties are backward-looking.
Keywords
political parties’ strategies, electoral performance, anticipation of opinion polls, government-opposition dynamics, topic modeling, Taverne
Citation
Van der Velden, M, Schumacher, G & Vis, B 2018, 'Living in the Past or Living in the Future? Analyzing Parties' Platform Change In-between Elections, The Netherlands 1997-2014', Political Communication, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 393-412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1384771