Comparison of the 6-minute walk distance measured on a 30 m track with guidance of a healthcare professional and those measured with a mobile application outdoors by participants themselves: a validation study

Publication date

2023-07-01

Authors

Klompstra, Leonie
Lans, Charlotta
Mercke, Emil
Strömberg, Anna
Jaarsma, TinyORCID 0000-0002-4197-4026

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

To improve the practical application of measuring exercise capacity, the purpose of this study was to compare the 6 min walk distance (6MWD) obtained at a 30 m track with the guidance of healthcare professionals vs. the 6MWD obtained by participants themselves using an app. In total, 37 participants performed both tests. The mean of the differences between the 6MWD on the tests was -4 ± 45 m (95% limits of agreement: 84 to -99 m). The overall agreement between the two 6MWD measures was 97% with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.91-0.98, P < 0.001). The use of an app is feasible, reliable, and valid to assess the 6MWD.

Keywords

App, Cardiac, Delivery of Health Care, Exercise Test, Exercise Tolerance, Exercise capacity, Humans, Mobile Applications, Mobile applications, Validation, Walking, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Citation

Klompstra, L, Lans, C, Mercke, E, Strömberg, A & Jaarsma, T 2023, 'Comparison of the 6-minute walk distance measured on a 30 m track with guidance of a healthcare professional and those measured with a mobile application outdoors by participants themselves : a validation study', European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 544-546. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvac091