A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews
Publication date
2002-11
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
The constant comparative method (CCM) together with theoretical sampling constitutethe core of qualitative analysis in the grounded theory approach and in other types ofqualitative research. Since the application of the method remains rather unclear, researchers do not know how to `go about' the CCM in their research practice. This study contributes to a purposeful approach of the CCM in order to systematize the analysis process and to increase the traceability and verification of the analyses. The step by step approach is derived from and illustrated with an empirical study into the experience of multiple sclerosis (MS) by patients and their spousal care providers. In this study five different steps were distinguished on the basis of four criteria: (1) the data involved and the overall analysis activities, (2) the aim, (3) the results and (4) the questions asked. It is concluded that systematization of qualitative analysis results from the researcher using a sound plan for conducting CCM regarding these four aspects.
Keywords
qualitative research, constant comparative method, grounded theory, qualitative analysis, interviews, Taverne, International (English)
Citation
Boeije, H R 2002, 'A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews', Quality and Quantity, vol. 36, pp. 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020909529486