Assessing the role of the European Council and the European Commission during the migration and COVID-19 crises
Publication date
2024
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Over the past decades, ‘emergency politics’ has become a quasi-permanent feature of the European Union (EU). According to some, this has reinforced the trend towards a greater role for the European Council (EUCO) in EU agenda-setting, to the detriment of the European Commission (Commission). In this article, this claim is critically assessed by analysing two major crises: the 2015-2016 migration crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. By systematically tracing the various agenda-setting roles played by EU actors in these crises, two claims are made. First, using a more fine-grained typology of agenda-setting roles, the relationship between EUCO and the Commission is shown to be more nuanced than is often suggested. Second, EUCO and the Commission cannot be considered monolithic players. Instead, actors within these institutions operate outside of formal channels to purse their own policy goals. This puts in doubt the usefulness of focussing on the EUCO-Commission relationship in a purely inter-institutional sense.
Keywords
2015–2016 migration crisis, COVID-19 pandemic, European Commission, European Council, agenda-setting, emergency politics, Political Science and International Relations, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Moloney, D & Princen, S 2024, 'Assessing the role of the European Council and the European Commission during the migration and COVID-19 crises', West European Politics, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1556-1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2225403