Identification and quantitative characterization of multiphase fluid composition in ideal porous media based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance method
Publication date
2026-05
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Organic contaminants in the vadose zone pose persistent risks to groundwater quality, ecosystems, and human health. Accurate characterization of their distribution and movement is critical for environmental risk assessment and remediation strategies. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), a noninvasive and cost-effective geophysical method sensitive to hydrogen-bearing fluids, holds great potential for characterizing and tracking organic pollutants in the vadose zone. However, the interpretation of NMR signals is challenging because vadose zone organic contaminants exist as multiphase fluids. This work aims to analyze dynamic pore-scale displacement of water by petroleum hydrocarbons (represented by n-decane) in porous media visualized by X-ray computed tomography images, and further reveal the NMR responses under varying hydrocarbon-water distribution states. The results indicate that, compared to 1D T2 spectra, 2D D-T2 spectra can quantitatively reveal that the non-wetting phase (hydrocarbons) preferentially occupies larger pore spaces and the central (bulk) regions of the pores during the displacement process. This study enhances the accuracy of interpreting organic contaminant transport and distribution using vadose zone NMR data.
Keywords
low-field NMR, multiphase flow, organic contaminants, vadose zone, X-ray computed tomography, Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology, Geology, Earth-Surface Processes, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Citation
Zhou, J, Zhang, Y, Schröer, L, Cnudde, V & Zhang, C 2026, 'Identification and quantitative characterization of multiphase fluid composition in ideal porous media based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance method', Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 73-83. https://doi.org/10.16030/j.heg.202601068