Cooperation And Competition In Public Sector Negotiations, A Laboratory Experiment
Publication date
2019
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Negotiating is a core activity in the public and private sector. Because of varying public service motivation (PSM) between public- and private sector employees, we expect them to behave differently in negotiations. Moreover, one-shot negotiation settings are often studied while many negotiations in practice are repeated negotiations. We use a repeated linear public goods game in a laboratory experiment to test the link between PSM and the level of cooperation, using a sample of graduate and undergraduate students. The results show that high-PSM participants indeed contributed more over the entire experiment and therefore, acted more cooperative in a repeated negotiation. Matching negotiators to opponents with high-PSM, low-PSM did not alter the level of cooperation in negotiation. Based on this we conclude that cooperation in repeated negotiations is not conditional on the PSM of opponents. We conclude with implications for theory and practice.
Keywords
laboratory experiment, negotiation, public- and private-sector differences
Citation
Bouwman, R B, Van Thiel, S, van Deemen, A & Rouwette, E 2019, 'Cooperation And Competition In Public Sector Negotiations, A Laboratory Experiment', Public Performance & Management Review, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1164-1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1553720