The rhythm of risk: sexual behaviour, PrEP use and HIV risk perception between 1999 and 2018 among men who have sex with men in Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Publication date

2021-06

Authors

Basten, Maartje
den Daas, Chantal
Heijne, Janneke C M
Boyd, Anders
Davidovich, Udi
Rozhnova, GannaORCID 0000-0002-6725-7359
Kretzschmar, MEEORCID 0000-0002-4394-7697ISNI 0000000008454198
Matser, Amy

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

HIV risk perception plays a crucial role in the uptake of preventive strategies. We investigated how risk perception and its determinants changed between 1999 and 2018 in an open, prospective cohort of 1323 HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM). Risk perception, defined as the perceived likelihood of acquiring HIV in the past 6 months, changed over time: being relatively lower in 2008-2011, higher in 2012-2016, and again lower in 2017-2018. Irrespective of calendar year, condomless anal intercourse (AI) with casual partners and high numbers of partners were associated with higher risk perception. In 2017-2018, condomless receptive AI with a partner living with HIV was no longer associated with risk perception, while PrEP use and condomless AI with a steady partner were associated with lower risk perception. We showed that risk perception has fluctuated among MSM in the past 20 years. The Undetectable equals Untransmittable statement and PrEP coincided with lower perceived risk.

Keywords

Cohort studies, HIV risk perception, Men who have sex with men, Pre-exposure prophylaxis, Sexual behaviour, Sexually transmitted diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Social Psychology, Journal Article

Citation

Basten, M, den Daas, C, Heijne, J C M, Boyd, A, Davidovich, U, Rozhnova, G, Kretzschmar, M & Matser, A 2021, 'The rhythm of risk: sexual behaviour, PrEP use and HIV risk perception between 1999 and 2018 among men who have sex with men in Amsterdam, The Netherlands', AIDS and Behavior, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1800-1809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-03109-4