Addressing persistent evidence gaps in cardiovascular sex differences research – the potential of clinical care data

Publication date

2022

Authors

Bots, Sophie HeleenORCID 0000-0002-4483-5582ISNI 0000000506342455
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
den Ruijter, Hester M.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Women have historically been underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials, resulting in a lack of sex-specific data. This is especially problematic in two situations, namely those where diseases manifest differently in women and men and those where biological differences between the sexes might affect the efficacy and/or safety of medication. There is therefore a pressing need for datasets with proper representation of women to address questions related to these situations. Clinical care data could fit this bill nicely because of their unique broad scope across both patient groups and clinical measures. This perspective piece presents the potential of clinical care data in sex differences research and discusses current challenges clinical care data-based research faces. It also suggests strategies to reduce the effect of these limitations, and explores whether clinical care data alone will be sufficient to close evidence gaps or whether a more comprehensive approach is needed.

Keywords

Citation

Bots, S H, Onland-Moret, N C & den Ruijter, H M 2022, 'Addressing persistent evidence gaps in cardiovascular sex differences research – the potential of clinical care data', Frontiers in Global Women's Health, vol. 3, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.1006425