Tools or crutches? Budgeting human and machine autonomy when introducing GenAI in education

Publication date

2026

Authors

Balzan, Francesco
Angeli, Lorenzo
Meulenbroeks, Ralph FGORCID 0000-0001-6614-9156ISNI 0000000131143774
Russo, FedericaISNI 0000000352143540

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) in education brings renewed attention to learner autonomy – that is, whether learners can think and act independently. GenAI offers the promise of learning efficiency and personalization, while raising questions about its alignment with nurturing autonomous learners. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework to investigate the relationship between GenAI and learner autonomy, to guide the design of educational environments that are safe and autonomy-supporting. Our paper explores the multifaceted nature of autonomy across the cognitive, philosophical, political and computing fields, connecting theories such as self-determination theory with reflections on machine autonomy. Leveraging Latour's Actor-Network Theory, our framework aims to elucidate how autonomy is distributed between human and non-human actors in educational environments.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Our main contribution is the process of “autonomy budgeting”, viewing autonomy as a resource that is allocated and traded off between an ensemble of actors. Autonomy budgeting works as a guiding conceptual tool for researchers, educators, curriculum designers and policymakers to assess and manage the autonomy trade-offs involved in integrating GenAI into educational environments. By re-centering the learner's agency and capacity for self-regulation, autonomy budgeting provides a way to conceptualize and operationalize autonomy within AI-mediated education, and to navigate the complex interplay between human and machine agency in education. Our framework develops reflections on the socio-technical nature of educational processes, where technologies act as co-participants rather than neutral tools. Autonomy in education, becomes a multifaceted construct that spans (human) cognitive, epistemic and political domains, and must be considered vis-a-vis varying degrees of machine autonomy.

Keywords

Citation

Balzan, F, Angeli, L, Meulenbroeks, R & Russo, F 2026, 'Tools or crutches? Budgeting human and machine autonomy when introducing GenAI in education', Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 2, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/aiie-06-2025-0145