A Methodology for the Generation of Multi-Agent Argumentation Dialogue Scenarios
Publication date
2012-10-18
Editors
Cossentino, Massimo
Kaisers, Michael
Tuyls, Karl
Weiss, Gerhard
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Increasingly research into the uses of argumentation in multi- agent dialogues takes an experimental approach. Such studies explore how agents can successfully employ argumentation besides the best and worst case situations of formal analysis. While a vital part in these ex- periments is influenced by the scenarios from which dialogues are gen- erated, there is very little research on how these can be generated in a meaningful way, respecting the characteristics of the underlying dialogue problem. This paper proposes, by means of an example system for delib- eration dialogues, a methodology for the construction and evaluation of a scenario generation process. It is shown how scenarios can accomodate argumentation with structured arguments and how it is tested whether the generated scenarios are interesting for experimentation.
Keywords
Psychologie (PSYC)
Citation
Kok, E M, Meyer, J-JC, van Oostendorp, H, Prakken, H & Vreeswijk, G A W 2012, A Methodology for the Generation of Multi-Agent Argumentation Dialogue Scenarios. in M Cossentino, M Kaisers, K Tuyls & G Weiss (eds), Multi-Agent Systems : 9th European Workshop, EUMAS 2011, Maastricht, The Netherlands, November 14-15, 2011. Revised Selected Papers. 1 edn, Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol. 7541, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34799-3_11