Electrocorticographic language mapping with a listening task consisting of alternating speech and music phrases
Publication date
2016-02-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Electrocorticographic (ECoG) mapping of high gamma activity induced by language tasks has been proposed as a more patient friendly alternative for electrocortical stimulation mapping (ESM), the gold standard in pre-surgical language mapping of epilepsy patients. However, ECoG mapping often reveals more language areas than considered critical with ESM. We investigated if critical language areas can be identified with a listening task consisting of speech and music phrases. METHODS: Nine patients with implanted subdural grid electrodes listened to an audio fragment in which music and speech alternated. We analysed ECoG power in the 65-95Hz band and obtained task-related activity patterns in electrodes over language areas. We compared the spatial distribution of sites that discriminated between listening to speech and music to ESM results using sensitivity and specificity calculations. RESULTS: Our listening task of alternating speech and music phrases had a low sensitivity (0.32) but a high specificity (0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The high specificity indicates that this test does indeed point to areas that are critical to language processing. SIGNIFICANCE: Our test cannot replace ESM, but this short and simple task can give a reliable indication where to find critical language areas, better than ECoG mapping using language tasks alone.
Keywords
Electrocortical stimulation mapping, Electrocorticography, Epilepsy surgery, Language, Music, Taverne, Clinical Neurology, Neurology, Physiology (medical), Sensory Systems, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Citation
Mooij, A H, Huiskamp, G J M, Gosselaar, P H & Ferrier, C H 2016, 'Electrocorticographic language mapping with a listening task consisting of alternating speech and music phrases', Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 1113-1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.08.005