Zebrafish embryotoxicity test for developmental (neuro)toxicity: Demo case of an integrated screening approach system using anti-epileptic drugs

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , 1_s2.0_S0890623814002032_main.pdf (5.24 MB)

Publication date

2014-01-01

Authors

Beker van Woudenberg, Anna
Snel, Cor
Rijkmans, Eke
De Groot, Didima
Bouma, Marga
Hermsen, Sanne
Piersma, A. H.ISNI 0000000022861646
Menke, Aswin
Wolterbeek, André

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

To improve the predictability of the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental (neuro)toxicity screening, we used a multiple-endpoints strategy, including morphology, motor activity (MA), histopathology and kinetics. The model compounds used were antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), ethosuximide (ETH) and levetiracetam (LEV). For VPA, histopathology was the most sensitive parameter, showing effects already at 60. μM. For CBZ, morphology and MA were the most sensitive parameters, showing effects at 180. μM. For ETH, all endpoints showed similar sensitivity (6.6. mM), whereas MA was the most sensitive parameter for LEV (40. mM). Inclusion of kinetics did not alter the absolute ranking of the compounds, but the relative potency was changed considerably. Taking all together, this demo-case study showed that inclusion of multiple-endpoints in ZET may increase the sensitivity of the assay, contribute to the elucidation of the mode of toxic action and to a better definition of the applicability domain of ZET.

Keywords

Antiepileptic drugs, Behavior, Developmental (neuro)toxicity, Gene expression, Histopathology, Integrated test strategy, Kinetics, Zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET), Toxicology

Citation

Beker van Woudenberg, A, Snel, C, Rijkmans, E, De Groot, D, Bouma, M, Hermsen, S, Piersma, A, Menke, A & Wolterbeek, A 2014, 'Zebrafish embryotoxicity test for developmental (neuro)toxicity : Demo case of an integrated screening approach system using anti-epileptic drugs', Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 49, pp. 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.07.082