Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack
Publication date
2005
Authors
Vos, M. de
Oosten, V.R. van
Poecke, R.M.P. van
Pelt, J.A. van
Pozo, Maria J.
Mueller, M.J.
Buchala, A.J.
Métraux, J.P.
Loon, L.C. van
Dicke, M.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Plant defenses against pathogens and insects are regulated
differentially by cross-communicating signaling pathways
in which salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene
(ET) play key roles. To understand how plants integrate
pathogen- and insect-induced signals into specific defense
responses, we monitored the dynamics of SA, JA, and
ET signaling in Arabidopsis after attack by a set of microbial
pathogens and herbivorous insects with different
modes of attack. Arabidopsis plants were exposed to a pathogenic
leaf bacterium (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato), a
pathogenic leaf fungus (Alternaria brassicicola), tissuechewing
caterpillars (Pieris rapae), cell-content-feeding
thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), or phloem-feeding aphids
(Myzus persicae). Monitoring the signal signature in each
plant-attacker combination showed that the kinetics of SA,
JA, and ET production varies greatly in both quantity and
timing. Analysis of global gene expression profiles demonstrated
that the signal signature characteristic of each
Arabidopsis-attacker combination is orchestrated into a
surprisingly complex set of transcriptional alterations in
which, in all cases, stress-related genes are overrepresented.
Comparison of the transcript profiles revealed that consistent
changes induced by pathogens and insects with very
different modes of attack can show considerable overlap.
Of all consistent changes induced by A. brassicicola, Pieris
rapae, and F. occidentalis, more than 50% also were induced
consistently by P. syringae. Notably, although these four
attackers all stimulated JA biosynthesis, the majority of the changes in JA-responsive gene expression were attacker
specific. All together, our study shows that SA, JA, and ET
play a primary role in the orchestration of the plant’s
defense response, but other regulatory mechanisms, such
as pathway cross-talk or additional attacker-induced signals,
eventually shape the highly complex attacker-specific defense
response.
Keywords
innate immunity, microarray, plant defense responses