The Flotilla Case before the icc: The Need to Do Justice while Keeping Heaven Intact

Publication date

2015

Authors

Knoops, Geert Jan AlexanderISNI 0000000080030541
Zwart, TomISNI 0000000081988188

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

This article analyses the decision of the icc Pre-Trial Chamber of 16 July 2015 in which it requested the Prosecutor to reconsider its decision not to initiate an investigation into the situation of the registered vessels of the Union of the Comoros, Greece and Cambodia. In 2010, the Israeli Defense Forces (idf) had intercepted a humanitarian aid flotilla that was trying to breach one of its naval blockades. The Prosecutor deemed the case of insufficient gravity to initiate an investigation. By requesting the Prosecutor to reconsider its decision, the Pre-Trial Chamber created a precedent vis-à-vis the boundaries of prosecutorial discretion. This article addresses the test of Article 53(1) icc Statute and inquires whether the Pre-Trial Chamber applied a correct standard of review. Whilst concluding that the Chamber erred in this standard, the authors introduce a standard of review that anticipates the interrelationship between prosecutorial discretion and judicial review.

Keywords

anticipated evidence, gravity, humanitarian law, mens rea, preliminary investigation, prosecutorial discretion, reasonable basis to proceed, standard of review, Taverne

Citation

Knoops, G J A & Zwart, T 2015, 'The Flotilla Case before the icc: The Need to Do Justice while Keeping Heaven Intact', International Criminal Law Review, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1069-1097. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01506006